SL4
By Thread

Most recent messages
336 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Thread view | Next Folder, Thread view | List of Folders

Starting: Sun Feb 06 2000 - 21:45:41 MST
Ending: Fri Sep 07 2012 - 08:45:47 MDT

• Re: [sl4] Friendly AI in the media: Terminator, the Sarah Connor Chronicles Michael Anissimov (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 15:50:35 MST)
  • RE: [sl4] Friendly AI in the media: Terminator, the Sarah Connor Chronicles ' ' (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 15:54:58 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Friendly AI in the media: Terminator, the Sarah Connor Chronicles Michael Anissimov (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 16:27:04 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Friendly AI in the media: Terminator, the Sarah Connor Chronicles Vladimir Nesov (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 18:43:21 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Friendly AI in the media: Terminator, the Sarah Connor Chronicles Hector Zenil (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 19:12:32 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Friendly AI in the media: Terminator, the Sarah Connor Chronicles Dagon Gmail (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 23:16:19 MST)
• Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Samantha Atkins (Sun Feb 01 2009 - 20:21:50 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stuart Armstrong (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 02:54:38 MST)
• [sl4] Yesterday's Special Event in Second Life: Max' surprise birthday party Eschatoon Magic (Sun Feb 01 2009 - 01:27:19 MST)
• [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade Stuart Armstrong (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 03:58:38 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade Dagon Gmail (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 13:20:59 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 17:36:30 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade Dagon Gmail (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 01:42:14 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade Dagon Gmail (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 01:50:31 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 03:52:07 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade. John K Clark (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 14:50:40 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade. Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 17:54:04 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade. Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 03:30:53 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade. Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 03:27:41 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade. John K Clark (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 14:22:49 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade. Aleksi Liimatainen (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 15:09:22 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade. Johnicholas Hines (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 15:43:53 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade. Stuart Armstrong (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 03:05:31 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade. John K Clark (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 10:44:49 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade. Stuart Armstrong (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 03:03:49 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade. John K Clark (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 10:32:56 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads, slavery, concerts and fair trade. Vladimir Nesov (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 12:18:16 MST)
• [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 04:44:47 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 08:02:15 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stuart Armstrong (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 08:44:26 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 10:05:49 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 04:04:41 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 16:24:25 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Andrew Hay (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 17:44:09 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 19:04:05 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Vladimir Nesov (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 05:02:30 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 14:41:59 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Krekoski Ross (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 18:29:48 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Krekoski Ross (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 18:56:44 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stuart Armstrong (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 02:53:33 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 10:13:25 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Randall Randall (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 11:49:21 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 09:35:55 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Heartland (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 17:29:44 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Mike Dougherty (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 18:28:56 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 09:37:56 MST)
      • [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Filipe Sobreira (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 10:36:55 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 11:38:15 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Krekoski Ross (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 23:21:02 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 10:45:30 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Stuart Armstrong (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 03:17:55 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 13:40:30 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Matt Mahoney (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 16:09:20 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Krekoski Ross (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 19:16:24 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Miguel Azevedo (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 02:27:08 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Krekoski Ross (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 03:28:53 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 10:54:57 MST)
      • [sl4] A teleporter John K Clark (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 11:36:04 MST)
      • [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Filipe Sobreira (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 16:13:07 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Joseph Henry (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 17:03:09 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Stuart Armstrong (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 03:12:26 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Joseph Henry (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 07:40:03 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 03:07:37 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) John K Clark (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 14:28:55 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Bryan Bishop (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 17:07:05 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Robin Lee Powell (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 17:13:38 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Charles Hixson (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 21:00:06 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Joseph Henry (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 17:13:41 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Bryan Bishop (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 22:14:26 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Joseph Henry (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 23:35:36 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) John K Clark (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 02:03:42 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) John K Clark (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 18:38:10 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Matt Mahoney (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 08:55:08 MST)
      • [sl4] Re: Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Filipe Sobreira (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 17:43:34 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Matt Mahoney (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 18:53:23 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Personal identity (was Re: A teleporter) Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 14:29:14 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] A teleporter Stuart Armstrong (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 03:01:56 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] A teleporter John K Clark (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 09:27:40 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] A teleporter Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 02:28:55 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] A teleporter Robin Lee Powell (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 15:29:48 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Krekoski Ross (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 20:24:55 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Krekoski Ross (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 20:56:12 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 10:24:14 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Krekoski Ross (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 18:58:02 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 00:33:41 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Krekoski Ross (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 01:35:56 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Krekoski Ross (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 19:53:22 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 00:49:19 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Lucas Sheehan (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 13:25:03 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Matt Mahoney (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 14:04:38 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Mike Dougherty (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 19:52:43 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Stuart Armstrong (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 03:09:25 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 10:32:08 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 16:02:48 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Peter de Blanc (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 20:47:36 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 01:09:16 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 03:47:47 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 10:06:39 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Peter de Blanc (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 17:31:14 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 11:19:11 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Stuart Armstrong (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 03:49:27 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 09:50:47 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Stuart Armstrong (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 03:09:13 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Charles Hixson (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 17:31:53 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stuart Armstrong (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 04:45:31 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 09:44:13 MST)
      • [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Filipe Sobreira (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 10:31:01 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 11:43:39 MST)
      • [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Filipe Sobreira (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 13:27:54 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 10:17:33 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stuart Armstrong (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 03:38:08 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 14:19:42 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 03:32:25 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 10:19:41 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stuart Armstrong (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 03:36:39 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 22:18:20 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Krekoski Ross (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 22:53:34 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 06:33:52 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 15:58:04 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 11:35:15 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Randall Randall (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 12:05:56 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Krekoski Ross (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 02:21:25 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 10:26:37 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Krekoski Ross (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 20:38:22 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 10:40:49 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 08:09:32 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stuart Armstrong (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 04:03:20 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Michael Anissimov (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 16:38:01 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Michael Anissimov (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 16:51:46 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 17:01:53 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 18:58:20 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 19:09:41 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 08:10:38 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 12:49:37 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 15:05:01 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 10:57:50 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Matt Mahoney (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 13:11:44 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Stuart Armstrong (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 03:40:25 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Matt Mahoney (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 07:07:05 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 08:54:55 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 08:35:03 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Vladimir Nesov (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 13:09:20 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 13:40:51 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 13:52:10 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 14:20:27 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 11:47:31 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 13:58:38 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 14:32:39 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Vladimir Nesov (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 15:33:58 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 18:27:37 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 10:08:33 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 17:40:47 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 21:30:38 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 21:45:38 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 08:17:20 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 10:50:30 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Matt Mahoney (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 12:48:10 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Vladimir Nesov (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 13:08:13 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Johnicholas Hines (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 13:36:56 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Matt Mahoney (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 15:27:45 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Mon Mar 02 2009 - 10:25:38 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Krekoski Ross (Mon Mar 02 2009 - 18:22:09 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 10:04:30 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Mike Dougherty (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 12:23:39 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Stuart Armstrong (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 04:24:54 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stathis Papaioannou (Mon Mar 02 2009 - 04:18:41 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Mon Mar 02 2009 - 07:23:55 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Norman Noman (Mon Mar 02 2009 - 09:54:11 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Mon Mar 02 2009 - 10:11:27 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Mon Mar 02 2009 - 10:26:49 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Mon Mar 02 2009 - 14:21:03 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Mon Mar 02 2009 - 10:05:19 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stathis Papaioannou (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 03:57:37 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 08:07:02 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Roko Mijic (Mon Mar 02 2009 - 11:52:14 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stathis Papaioannou (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 03:49:17 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Mon Mar 02 2009 - 13:28:37 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stathis Papaioannou (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 04:22:05 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 08:28:43 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 09:01:29 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 09:54:19 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 10:45:27 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 11:32:29 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 11:59:53 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 12:09:54 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 12:27:02 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Vladimir Nesov (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 12:48:50 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 13:15:19 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Vladimir Nesov (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 16:38:33 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 13:00:55 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? ' ' (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 14:54:55 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 16:05:18 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? ' ' (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 17:21:29 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 17:33:20 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? ' ' (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 17:52:30 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 19:36:11 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? ' ' (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 20:28:29 MST)
      • [sl4] Offtopic about the singularity. ' ' (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 21:11:03 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 21:20:54 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? ' ' (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 22:28:56 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Krekoski Ross (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 23:06:07 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? rick.smith@ntlworld.com (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 02:58:40 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stathis Papaioannou (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 03:28:42 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? rick.smith@ntlworld.com (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 03:50:33 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stathis Papaioannou (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 06:25:01 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 08:41:35 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? ' ' (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 14:56:50 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? ' ' (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 15:29:13 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stathis Papaioannou (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 03:33:50 MST)
      • Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Matt Mahoney (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 14:16:00 MST)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Mike Dougherty (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 16:57:50 MST)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Stathis Papaioannou (Fri Mar 06 2009 - 06:50:59 MST)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Matt Mahoney (Fri Mar 06 2009 - 08:14:02 MST)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Stathis Papaioannou (Fri Mar 06 2009 - 18:23:15 MST)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Matt Mahoney (Sat Mar 07 2009 - 16:13:30 MST)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Stathis Papaioannou (Sat Mar 07 2009 - 19:08:25 MST)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Matt Mahoney (Sat Mar 07 2009 - 19:34:52 MST)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Stathis Papaioannou (Sat Mar 07 2009 - 20:32:13 MST)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Matt Mahoney (Sun Mar 08 2009 - 11:00:47 MDT)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Mike Dougherty (Sun Mar 08 2009 - 13:06:00 MDT)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Harvey Newstrom (Sun Mar 08 2009 - 13:40:20 MDT)
      • [sl4] Re: Many-worlds John K Clark (Sun Mar 08 2009 - 14:10:42 MDT)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Stathis Papaioannou (Sun Mar 08 2009 - 17:32:56 MDT)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Mike Dougherty (Sun Mar 08 2009 - 18:45:17 MDT)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Vladimir Nesov (Sun Mar 08 2009 - 19:06:44 MDT)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Matt Mahoney (Mon Mar 09 2009 - 08:16:26 MDT)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Mon Mar 09 2009 - 23:35:59 MDT)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Tue Mar 10 2009 - 02:53:50 MDT)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Stathis Papaioannou (Sun Mar 08 2009 - 19:54:45 MDT)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Mike Dougherty (Sun Mar 08 2009 - 21:54:21 MDT)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Stathis Papaioannou (Mon Mar 09 2009 - 02:17:43 MDT)
      • [sl4] Re: Many-worlds John K Clark (Mon Mar 09 2009 - 13:55:55 MDT)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Charles Hixson (Fri Mar 06 2009 - 23:05:28 MST)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Matt Mahoney (Sat Mar 07 2009 - 16:11:28 MST)
      • Re: Many-worlds (was Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?) Harvey Newstrom (Sun Mar 08 2009 - 14:01:43 MDT)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 10:37:27 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 10:56:25 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Stathis Papaioannou (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 18:30:43 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Mike Dougherty (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 20:33:21 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Stathis Papaioannou (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 03:55:21 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? ' ' (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 17:36:01 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 13:38:31 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 10:21:32 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stathis Papaioannou (Tue Mar 03 2009 - 23:01:29 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stuart Armstrong (Mon Mar 02 2009 - 10:38:37 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Dagon Gmail (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 03:57:23 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Toby Weston (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 01:07:00 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 08:33:28 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 13:51:23 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Toby Weston (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 16:32:21 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Toby Weston (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 16:40:19 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 17:49:45 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 10:41:05 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Matt Mahoney (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 14:39:45 MST)
      • [sl4] New Blog Denis (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 15:01:14 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Randall Randall (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 15:13:19 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Matt Mahoney (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 15:43:22 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Stuart Armstrong (Fri Mar 06 2009 - 03:12:17 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. Matt Mahoney (Fri Mar 06 2009 - 08:42:35 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right?. John K Clark (Fri Mar 06 2009 - 09:15:05 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Toby Weston (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 16:50:50 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Wed Mar 04 2009 - 17:28:26 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Toby Weston (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 00:44:33 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 10:56:06 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Randall Randall (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 11:19:03 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Fri Mar 06 2009 - 08:20:24 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Randall Randall (Fri Mar 06 2009 - 13:59:34 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Fri Mar 06 2009 - 15:09:43 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 11:15:55 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Fri Mar 06 2009 - 08:47:54 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Fri Mar 06 2009 - 22:53:01 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Sat Mar 07 2009 - 00:57:26 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Sat Mar 07 2009 - 01:30:03 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Sat Mar 07 2009 - 02:49:06 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Charles Hixson (Sat Mar 07 2009 - 11:18:49 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Sat Mar 07 2009 - 22:49:49 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Toby Weston (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 07:31:12 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Toby Weston (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 15:13:34 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? John K Clark (Fri Mar 06 2009 - 14:24:34 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Toby Weston (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 15:46:31 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Re: Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stuart Armstrong (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 03:05:28 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 08:09:10 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Mike Dougherty (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:22:55 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 08:11:31 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Stuart Armstrong (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 08:47:25 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Johnicholas Hines (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 09:45:46 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Uploads coming first would be good, right? Matt Mahoney (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 10:25:16 MST)
• [sl4] Offering a chatroom to hangout Crunchy Frog (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 16:21:38 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Offering a chatroom to hangout Bryan Bishop (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 16:42:50 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Offering a chatroom to hangout Robin Lee Powell (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 17:02:13 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Offering a chatroom to hangout Bryan Bishop (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 17:03:43 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Offering a chatroom to hangout justin corwin (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 17:23:08 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Offering a chatroom to hangout Bryan Bishop (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 21:24:30 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Offering a chatroom to hangout Michael Anissimov (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 17:09:43 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Offering a chatroom to hangout Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 01:40:23 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Offering a chatroom to hangout justin corwin (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 16:48:56 MST)
• [sl4] Google, NASA and Kurzweil to found "Singularity University" Aleksei Riikonen (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 00:55:21 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Google, NASA and Kurzweil to found "Singularity University" Robin Lee Powell (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 01:12:52 MST)
    • [sl4] Re: Google, NASA and Kurzweil to found "Singularity University" Aleksei Riikonen (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 01:34:31 MST)
  • [sl4] Re: Google, NASA and Kurzweil to found "Singularity University" Aleksei Riikonen (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 02:45:14 MST)
    • [sl4] RE: [wta-talk] Google,NASA and Kurzweil to found "Singularity University" Amara D. Angelica (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 03:17:19 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] RE: [wta-talk] Google,NASA and Kurzweil to found "Singularity University" Thomas Buckner (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 10:07:59 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] RE: [wta-talk] Google,NASA and Kurzweil to found "Singularity University" David Orban (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 10:36:50 MST)
• [sl4] RE: [wta-talk] Google, NASA and Kurzweil to found "Singularity University" Amara D. Angelica (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 06:20:18 MST)
• [sl4] simplistic models of capability growth Johnicholas Hines (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 18:27:36 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] simplistic models of capability growth Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 11:26:19 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] simplistic models of capability growth Johnicholas Hines (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 16:23:03 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] simplistic models of capability growth Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 02:31:41 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] simplistic models of capability growth Johnicholas Hines (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 15:34:00 MST)
• [sl4] NEWS: Transhumanism Answers Critics - Feb 6 2009 Issue Natasha Vita-More (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 10:56:57 MST)
• [sl4] Human Futures: Comment to the Global Spiral! Natasha Vita-More (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 09:01:54 MST)
• [sl4] Weakening morality Vladimir Nesov (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 12:56:14 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Matt Mahoney (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 14:29:48 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Johnicholas Hines (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 16:37:20 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Vladimir Nesov (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 18:08:18 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 06:32:20 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Vladimir Nesov (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 07:09:54 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 14:47:07 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Vladimir Nesov (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 15:21:07 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Stefan Pernar (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 16:47:49 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Matt Mahoney (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 18:57:40 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 02:46:59 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Stefan Pernar (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 06:55:18 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 07:55:36 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Stefan Pernar (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 08:43:01 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Stuart Armstrong (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 03:58:31 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Weakening morality Charles Hixson (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 13:43:07 MST)
• [sl4] Please upload some molecular reintegration Brad Johnson (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 02:17:25 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Please upload some molecular reintegration John K Clark (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 03:17:10 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Please upload some molecular reintegration Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 03:49:15 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Please upload some molecular reintegration John K Clark (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 09:40:09 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Please upload some molecular reintegration Brad Johnson (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 10:01:50 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Please upload some molecular reintegration John K Clark (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 13:49:41 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Please upload some molecular reintegration Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 02:08:45 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Please upload some molecular reintegration Matt Mahoney (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 09:35:59 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Please upload some molecular reintegration Brad Johnson (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 10:30:54 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Please upload some molecular reintegration Matt Mahoney (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 10:47:41 MST)
• [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 04:31:04 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Matt Mahoney (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 15:17:52 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Samantha Atkins (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 02:12:43 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Matt Mahoney (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 09:07:28 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Johnicholas Hines (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 12:13:00 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 13:02:18 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Matt Mahoney (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 16:23:05 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Samantha Atkins (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 00:34:32 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Matt Mahoney (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 13:50:03 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Matt Mahoney (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 16:09:27 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Charles Hixson (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 16:44:06 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Matt Mahoney (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 17:39:45 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Vladimir Nesov (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 17:48:41 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Matt Mahoney (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 17:27:02 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Samantha Atkins (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 00:45:12 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Samantha Atkins (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 00:41:09 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Johnicholas Hines (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 18:06:14 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 03:22:48 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Matt Mahoney (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 18:16:49 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading BillK (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 01:32:21 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Matt Mahoney (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 15:52:49 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading BillK (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 16:30:51 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Matt Mahoney (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 20:10:24 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading BillK (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 01:50:33 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Miguel Azevedo (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 03:09:22 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Charles Hixson (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 18:16:16 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 07:03:55 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Miguel Azevedo (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 07:18:19 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading BillK (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 07:30:11 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Stuart Armstrong (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 03:46:42 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Samantha Atkins (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 00:38:45 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] 'Ethical' uploading Matt Mahoney (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 13:58:57 MST)
• [sl4] normative language is rational Johnicholas Hines (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 21:09:08 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 01:28:14 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Johnicholas Hines (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 07:29:49 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 06:32:13 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Charles Hixson (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 10:37:14 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Johnicholas Hines (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 11:20:40 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Charles Hixson (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 13:50:57 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Johnicholas Hines (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 14:57:43 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Charles Hixson (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 19:21:15 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Stathis Papaioannou (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 02:03:08 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Dimitry Volfson (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 16:17:01 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Stathis Papaioannou (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 19:39:15 MST)
      • RE: [sl4] normative language is rational Peter Voss (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 19:48:29 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Dimitry Volfson (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 01:13:50 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Stathis Papaioannou (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 01:58:26 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Dimitry Volfson (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 11:44:14 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Stathis Papaioannou (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 04:57:38 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] normative language is rational Vladimir Nesov (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 12:46:53 MST)
• [sl4] foundationalism Johnicholas Hines (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 09:23:14 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 06:45:57 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] foundationalism B Ziomek (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 08:24:08 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Johnicholas Hines (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 09:58:15 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Eschatoon Magic (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 12:56:01 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Johnicholas Hines (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 13:19:24 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Eschatoon Magic (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 01:12:36 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Johnicholas Hines (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 05:05:41 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 04:53:17 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Stuart Armstrong (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 07:57:06 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Eschatoon Magic (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 00:18:29 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Stuart Armstrong (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 02:53:28 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Krekoski Ross (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 03:18:53 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Eschatoon Magic (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 06:54:30 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Stuart Armstrong (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 07:41:42 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] foundationalism Vladimir Nesov (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 12:55:52 MST)
• [sl4] another toy model of capability growth Stuart Armstrong (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 04:35:20 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] another toy model of capability growth Johnicholas Hines (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 10:52:37 MST)
• [sl4] "The Mediated Technological Singularity" - Vita-More Natasha Vita-More (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 08:42:14 MST)
• [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 07:39:28 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Matt Mahoney (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 09:40:02 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 11:30:16 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Stefan Pernar (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 16:47:37 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Johnicholas Hines (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 12:49:42 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Matt Mahoney (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 13:42:46 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Johnicholas Hines (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 14:20:26 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Matt Mahoney (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 15:09:22 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Johnicholas Hines (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 20:00:22 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Matt Mahoney (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 06:56:40 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Krekoski Ross (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 07:33:49 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Johnicholas Hines (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 07:47:21 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Krekoski Ross (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 07:53:55 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Johnicholas Hines (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 08:30:11 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Vladimir Nesov (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 13:14:29 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] An attempt at empathic AI Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 22:49:51 MST)
• [sl4] FAI development within academia. Roko Mijic (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 15:20:13 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Matt Mahoney (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 07:37:15 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Roko Mijic (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 10:21:52 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Matt Mahoney (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 11:06:03 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. J. Andrew Rogers (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 13:41:14 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Matt Mahoney (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 17:40:04 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Eliezer Yudkowsky (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 17:54:17 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Roko Mijic (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 18:49:32 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Vladimir Nesov (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 04:50:00 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. William Pearson (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 06:58:37 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Roko Mijic (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 07:28:58 MST)
      • Cost of AI (was Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia.) Matt Mahoney (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 09:21:38 MST)
      • Re: Cost of AI (was Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia.) BillK (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 10:22:06 MST)
      • Re: Cost of AI (was Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia.) BillK (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 10:21:39 MST)
      • Re: Cost of AI (was Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia.) Matt Mahoney (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 18:22:58 MST)
      • Re: Cost of AI (was Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia.) Stuart Armstrong (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 03:40:13 MST)
      • Re: Cost of AI (was Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia.) Matt Mahoney (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 09:05:06 MST)
      • Re: Cost of AI (was Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia.) Stuart Armstrong (Fri Feb 27 2009 - 04:36:16 MST)
      • Re: Cost of AI (was Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia.) Matt Mahoney (Fri Feb 27 2009 - 08:00:57 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Joshua Fox (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 14:08:50 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Roko Mijic (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 15:57:16 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Roko Mijic (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 17:16:07 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Vladimir Nesov (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 17:30:37 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Roko Mijic (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 18:53:18 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Joshua Fox (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 06:55:48 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Matt Mahoney (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 08:29:11 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Roko Mijic (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:29:33 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Roko Mijic (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:36:07 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Matt Mahoney (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 13:40:47 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Joshua Fox (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 13:58:05 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Matt Mahoney (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 15:13:27 MST)
• [sl4] Factors of intelligence Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 05:40:31 MST)
  • Re: [sl4] Factors of intelligence Matt Mahoney (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 08:43:28 MST)
    • Re: [sl4] Factors of intelligence Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 03:28:43 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Factors of intelligence Matt Mahoney (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 08:57:03 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Factors of intelligence Johnicholas Hines (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 09:14:30 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Factors of intelligence Roko Mijic (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 09:21:39 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Factors of intelligence Randall Schmidt (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 21:23:45 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Factors of intelligence Vladimir Nesov (Fri Feb 27 2009 - 08:54:02 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Factors of intelligence Joost Rekveld (Sun Mar 01 2009 - 13:15:34 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Factors of intelligence Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Thu Mar 05 2009 - 13:05:15 MST)
      • Re: [sl4] Factors of intelligence Petter Wingren-Rasmussen (Fri Feb 27 2009 - 01:09:35 MST)
      • [sl4] Off this Listserv David Massoglia (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 11:53:13 MST)
• [sl4] spooky activation at a distance Krekoski Ross (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 08:43:48 MST)
  • [sl4] Re: spooky activation at a distance Krekoski Ross (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 08:46:48 MST)
• [sl4] Stand-Up for Human Rights - Vita-More in Poland Natasha Vita-More (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 09:03:04 MST)
• Will Machine Learning lead to AGI? Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. William Pearson (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 19:14:47 MST)
  • Re: Will Machine Learning lead to AGI? Re: [sl4] FAI development within academia. Vladimir Nesov (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 19:39:34 MST)

Last message date: Fri Sep 07 2012 - 08:45:47 MDT
Archived on: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:16 MDT

336 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Thread view Next Folder, Thread view List of Folders

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:16 MDT