SL4
By Date

Most recent messages
269 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Date view | Next Folder, Date view | List of Folders

Starting: Sun Feb 06 2000 - 21:45:41 MST
Ending: Fri Sep 07 2012 - 08:45:47 MDT

• JOIN: Olie NcLean Olie Lamb (Thu Sep 01 2005 - 01:16:53 MDT)
• Re: Bayesians & Pascal's wager Phil Goetz (Thu Sep 01 2005 - 09:37:29 MDT)
• Re: hmmmm Phil Goetz (Thu Sep 01 2005 - 09:52:42 MDT)
• Julian Jaynes (Re: JOIN: Olie NcLean) Phil Goetz (Thu Sep 01 2005 - 10:02:58 MDT)
• Re: Julian Jaynes (Re: JOIN: Olie NcLean) brannen (Thu Sep 01 2005 - 12:05:54 MDT)
• Re: Julian Jaynes Richard Loosemore (Thu Sep 01 2005 - 12:16:22 MDT)
• not _quite_ sl4, but... REGENERATING MICE! wheee! Psy Kosh (Thu Sep 01 2005 - 13:43:38 MDT)
• Re: Julian Jaynes (Re: JOIN: Olie NcLean) Peter de Blanc (Thu Sep 01 2005 - 15:42:05 MDT)
• Re: Julian Jaynes (Re: JOIN: Olie NcLean) Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Thu Sep 01 2005 - 16:12:08 MDT)
• Re: Julian Jaynes (Re: JOIN: Olie NcLean) Tennessee Leeuwenburg (Thu Sep 01 2005 - 18:42:50 MDT)
• Remove jogdendavis@mail.utexas.edu (Fri Sep 02 2005 - 14:12:36 MDT)
• Remove eldras@london.com (Fri Sep 02 2005 - 14:48:06 MDT)
• META: No removes, please. Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Fri Sep 02 2005 - 15:12:12 MDT)
• Re: Retrenchment Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Mon Sep 05 2005 - 15:14:49 MDT)
• Bayes and the conceptual framework Tennessee Leeuwenburg (Mon Sep 05 2005 - 19:22:50 MDT)
• Kolmogorov + Solomonoff H C (Tue Sep 06 2005 - 10:38:35 MDT)
• Re: Retrenchment Phil Goetz (Tue Sep 06 2005 - 13:23:02 MDT)
• Fwd: Introduction TRANSPLANTED from seedaiwannabees. justin corwin (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 00:28:58 MDT)
• General shock level qualitative differences (Re: SL5 TOE) Olie Lamb (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 01:02:10 MDT)
• RE: Introduction TRANSPLANTED from seedaiwannabees. Ben Goertzel (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 07:14:15 MDT)
• Re: Development models. Michael Wilson (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 08:02:15 MDT)
• Re: Introduction TRANSPLANTED from seedaiwannabees. Richard Loosemore (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 08:12:59 MDT)
• RE: Development models. Ben Goertzel (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 08:17:20 MDT)
• RE: Introduction TRANSPLANTED from seedaiwannabees. Ben Goertzel (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 08:22:56 MDT)
• Re: Introduction Michael Wilson (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 09:15:17 MDT)
• RE: Introduction TRANSPLANTED from seedaiwannabees. Phillip Huggan (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 09:19:43 MDT)
• RE: Introduction Ben Goertzel (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 09:49:24 MDT)
• a2i2 opportunities Peter Voss (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 10:00:26 MDT)
• Re: Introduction Chris Capel (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 10:00:40 MDT)
• Re: Development models. Stephen Reed (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 12:03:32 MDT)
• Re: Introduction J. Andrew Rogers (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 12:25:00 MDT)
• RE: Development models. Phil Goetz (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 13:15:08 MDT)
• Tools for AI and Human Genome Project Phil Goetz (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 13:16:53 MDT)
• Re: Introduction Phil Goetz (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 13:22:04 MDT)
• RE: Tools for AI and Human Genome Project Ben Goertzel (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 15:03:40 MDT)
• RE: Introduction Ben Goertzel (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 15:10:24 MDT)
• Fwd: Re: General Intelligence Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 15:33:25 MDT)
• Re: Introduction rpwl@lightlink.com (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 18:05:24 MDT)
• Re: Introduction rpwl@lightlink.com (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 18:08:08 MDT)
• The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Richard Loosemore (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 18:37:02 MDT)
• RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Peter Voss (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 18:49:04 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 18:47:37 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 20:11:44 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems Michael Wilson (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 20:28:54 MDT)
• RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Ben Goertzel (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 20:36:30 MDT)
• RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Ben Goertzel (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 20:45:41 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 20:49:30 MDT)
• RE: Introduction Mikko Särelä (Wed Sep 07 2005 - 23:29:10 MDT)
• Formal Verification of Functional Programs [ was RE: Introduction] Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 05:52:03 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Wei Dai (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 09:16:02 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 09:52:56 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 10:22:55 MDT)
• AI communities Michael Vassar (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 10:49:40 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Phil Goetz (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 12:22:19 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] rpwl@lightlink.com (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 12:26:44 MDT)
• Re: Introduction J. Andrew Rogers (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 12:37:37 MDT)
• Re: AI communities Richard Loosemore (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 12:44:14 MDT)
• Evolution vs. design Phil Goetz (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 13:36:12 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Phil Goetz (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 13:53:24 MDT)
• Quick Clarification Richard Loosemore (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 14:28:30 MDT)
• Re: Introduction Richard Loosemore (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 14:37:41 MDT)
• Re: Introduction Michael Wilson (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 15:41:59 MDT)
• RE: Introduction Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 15:53:25 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Michael Wilson (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 16:05:42 MDT)
• RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 16:11:58 MDT)
• Re: Introduction J. Andrew Rogers (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 16:14:55 MDT)
• RE: Introduction Michael Wilson (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 16:28:24 MDT)
• RE: Introduction Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 16:32:46 MDT)
• RE: Introduction Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 16:33:20 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Joel Peter William Pitt (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 16:48:56 MDT)
• RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems Michael Wilson (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 17:04:48 MDT)
• RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 17:45:23 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Phil Goetz (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 17:50:18 MDT)
• Parallelism (Re: Introduction) Phil Goetz (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 17:55:57 MDT)
• RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 18:01:57 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Joel Peter William Pitt (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 18:02:40 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Phil Goetz (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 18:04:47 MDT)
• RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems Phil Goetz (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 18:07:29 MDT)
• RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Phil Goetz (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 18:09:48 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Michael Wilson (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 18:38:52 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 19:14:01 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 19:18:24 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems Jef Allbright (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 19:33:48 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems Joel Peter William Pitt (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 19:43:55 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Preposterous Posturing Damien Broderick (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 19:49:09 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems Tennessee Leeuwenburg (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 20:03:07 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems Joel Peter William Pitt (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 20:28:43 MDT)
• RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 20:30:13 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems Tennessee Leeuwenburg (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 22:45:06 MDT)
• Evolution still leaving its critics for dead Tennessee Leeuwenburg (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 23:06:27 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems Michael Wilson (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 23:35:15 MDT)
• Re: Parallelism (Re: Introduction) J. Andrew Rogers (Thu Sep 08 2005 - 23:48:24 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems Tennessee Leeuwenburg (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 00:15:11 MDT)
• Re: Parallelism (Re: Introduction) Tennessee Leeuwenburg (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 00:30:02 MDT)
• Re: Parallelism (Re: Introduction) Tennessee Leeuwenburg (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 00:36:28 MDT)
• Re: Parallelism (Re: Introduction) J. Andrew Rogers (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 01:34:56 MDT)
• Re: Introduction J. Andrew Rogers (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 02:18:26 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Mikko Särelä (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 04:11:28 MDT)
• RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Mikko Särelä (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 04:09:37 MDT)
• RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Ben Goertzel (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 04:36:41 MDT)
• Parallel computing, AGI, assignment of credit [was RE: Introduction] Ben Goertzel (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 04:57:03 MDT)
• Re: Parallelism (Re: Introduction) Tennessee Leeuwenburg (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 06:37:17 MDT)
• Re: Parallel computing, AGI, assignment of credit [was RE: Introduction] Stephen Reed (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 09:01:28 MDT)
• RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment] Phil Goetz (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 10:26:17 MDT)
• ICA (RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems)_ Phil Goetz (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 10:32:42 MDT)
• Immorally optimized? - alternate observation points H C (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 10:39:06 MDT)
• Nature isn't so sloppy Phil Goetz (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 11:31:50 MDT)
• Parallelizing attention and credit-assignment Phil Goetz (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 11:36:10 MDT)
• Re: The Relevance of Complex Systems Richard Loosemore (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 11:51:54 MDT)
• Re: Immorally optimized? - alternate observation points Phillip Huggan (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 12:15:04 MDT)
• Correction and retraction re: Nature isn't so sloppy Phil Goetz (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 12:54:36 MDT)
• Heterogenous Complex Systems Phil Goetz (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 12:58:29 MDT)
• Re: Nature isn't so sloppy Michael Wilson (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 13:30:07 MDT)
• Chaos and Complexity defined Phillip Huggan (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 13:38:02 MDT)
• Re: Heterogenous Complex Systems Phil Goetz (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 14:54:46 MDT)
• RE: Parallelizing attention and credit-assignment Ben Goertzel (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 15:02:07 MDT)
• RE: Parallelizing attention and credit-assignment Phil Goetz (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 15:30:55 MDT)
• RE: Parallelizing attention and credit-assignment Ben Goertzel (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 15:45:15 MDT)
• RE: Inference control Phil Goetz (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 18:32:32 MDT)
• Hempel's Paradox [ was RE: The Relevance of Complex Systems [was: Re: Retrenchment]] Ben Goertzel (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 10:17:00 MDT)
• RE: Inference control Ben Goertzel (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 19:13:23 MDT)
• Re: Heterogenous Complex Systems Richard Loosemore (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 19:38:03 MDT)
• Re: Heterogenous Complex Systems Richard Loosemore (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 19:40:36 MDT)
• Re: Immorally optimized? - alternate observation points H C (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 20:07:05 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's Paradox Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Fri Sep 09 2005 - 21:11:18 MDT)
• potential technological idea David Picon Alvarez (Sat Sep 10 2005 - 13:14:09 MDT)
• RE: potential technological idea Ben Goertzel (Sat Sep 10 2005 - 16:16:20 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's Paradox Ben Goertzel (Sat Sep 10 2005 - 17:42:40 MDT)
• Re: potential technological idea David Picon Alvarez (Sat Sep 10 2005 - 18:40:21 MDT)
• mathematical reasoning Wei Dai (Sun Sep 11 2005 - 09:29:21 MDT)
• Re: mathematical reasoning Nick Hay (Sun Sep 11 2005 - 14:01:08 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's Paradox Jeff Medina (Sun Sep 11 2005 - 14:58:18 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's Paradox Ben Goertzel (Sun Sep 11 2005 - 20:08:56 MDT)
• Re: mathematical reasoning Wei Dai (Sun Sep 11 2005 - 20:35:58 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's Paradox Jeff Medina (Sun Sep 11 2005 - 20:41:14 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's Paradox David Hart (Sun Sep 11 2005 - 22:25:19 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's Paradox Ben Goertzel (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 07:46:50 MDT)
• Complex computer programs Phil Goetz (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 09:41:09 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's Paradox Phil Goetz (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 09:51:22 MDT)
• Non-black non-ravens etc. Richard Loosemore (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 10:02:34 MDT)
• RE: Non-black non-ravens etc. Ben Goertzel (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 10:16:42 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's Paradox Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 10:49:17 MDT)
• Re: Non-black non-ravens etc. Michael Wilson (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 12:06:52 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's Paradox Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 14:42:46 MDT)
• Re: Non-black non-ravens etc. Richard Loosemore (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 14:43:27 MDT)
• Re: Complex computer programs Richard Loosemore (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 14:54:35 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's Paradox Ashley Thomas (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 14:55:48 MDT)
• RE: Non-black non-ravens etc. Ben Goertzel (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 15:02:37 MDT)
• FW: Hempel's Paradox -- OOPS! Ben Goertzel (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 15:16:32 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's Paradox Ben Goertzel (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 15:26:31 MDT)
• Re: Complex computer programs Phil Goetz (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 15:28:23 MDT)
• Re: Non-black non-ravens etc. Richard Loosemore (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 18:22:00 MDT)
• Re: Complex computer programs Richard Loosemore (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 18:38:27 MDT)
• RE: Non-black non-ravens etc. Ben Goertzel (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 18:53:59 MDT)
• Re: Non-black non-ravens etc. Chris Capel (Mon Sep 12 2005 - 18:54:32 MDT)
• Re: Non-black non-ravens etc. Richard Loosemore (Tue Sep 13 2005 - 08:53:04 MDT)
• Re: Logics at multiple levels of abstraction Phil Goetz (Tue Sep 13 2005 - 09:38:41 MDT)
• CAS, symbolic and subsymbolic AI, etc. Ben Goertzel (Tue Sep 13 2005 - 10:19:42 MDT)
• Re: Logics at multiple levels of abstraction H C (Tue Sep 13 2005 - 10:36:17 MDT)
• Re: Non-black non-ravens etc. Michael Wilson (Tue Sep 13 2005 - 10:37:03 MDT)
• Re: Non-black non-ravens etc. Chris Capel (Tue Sep 13 2005 - 12:38:59 MDT)
• Re: Logics at multiple levels of abstraction Phil Goetz (Tue Sep 13 2005 - 12:49:50 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's Paradox -- OOPS! Ben Goertzel (Tue Sep 13 2005 - 13:03:26 MDT)
• Re: Logics at multiple levels of abstraction Michael Wilson (Tue Sep 13 2005 - 16:31:38 MDT)
• RE: Logics at multiple levels of abstraction Ben Goertzel (Tue Sep 13 2005 - 17:24:33 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's Paradox -- OOPS! Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Tue Sep 13 2005 - 19:28:42 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's Paradox -- OOPS! Ben Goertzel (Tue Sep 13 2005 - 19:56:29 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's Paradox -- OOPS! Ben Goertzel (Tue Sep 13 2005 - 20:32:02 MDT)
• Hempel's paradox redux Ben Goertzel (Wed Sep 14 2005 - 20:33:50 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's paradox redux Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Wed Sep 14 2005 - 23:36:32 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's paradox redux Marcello Mathias Herreshoff (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 00:50:37 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's paradox redux Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 06:38:13 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's paradox redux Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 06:38:13 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's paradox redux Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 14:02:10 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's paradox redux Russell Wallace (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 14:11:54 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's paradox redux Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 14:14:40 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's paradox redux Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 15:37:01 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's paradox redux Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 16:24:23 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's paradox redux Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 16:48:59 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's paradox redux Richard Loosemore (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 16:53:36 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's paradox redux Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 17:35:05 MDT)
• Hempel's paradox redux Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 20:25:40 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's paradox redux Jef Allbright (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 21:03:19 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's paradox redux Michael Wilson (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 21:13:20 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's paradox redux Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 21:25:05 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's paradox redux Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 21:25:06 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's paradox redux Ben Goertzel (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 21:40:01 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's paradox redux Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Thu Sep 15 2005 - 22:37:59 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's paradox redux Michael Wilson (Fri Sep 16 2005 - 00:43:56 MDT)
• AGI research methodology Ben Goertzel (Fri Sep 16 2005 - 04:10:04 MDT)
• RE: Hempel's paradox redux Ben Goertzel (Fri Sep 16 2005 - 04:36:34 MDT)
• Re: AGI research methodology Michael Wilson (Fri Sep 16 2005 - 05:12:14 MDT)
• RE: AGI research methodology Ben Goertzel (Fri Sep 16 2005 - 05:53:05 MDT)
• Re: Hempel's paradox redux Richard Loosemore (Fri Sep 16 2005 - 07:48:08 MDT)
• memetics of Bayes Michael Vassar (Fri Sep 16 2005 - 11:00:13 MDT)
• Re: memetics of Bayes Michael Anissimov (Fri Sep 16 2005 - 14:01:43 MDT)
• OT: Endgame:Singularity Alejandro Dubrovsky (Fri Sep 16 2005 - 23:24:16 MDT)
• Re: OT: Endgame:Singularity Robin Lee Powell (Sat Sep 17 2005 - 02:27:01 MDT)
• Re: OT: Endgame:Singularity Daniel Radetsky (Sat Sep 17 2005 - 03:42:49 MDT)
• Re: Endgame:Singularity Simon McClenahan (Sat Sep 17 2005 - 21:35:51 MDT)
• pattern recognition and verification Chris Capel (Sun Sep 18 2005 - 15:20:03 MDT)
• Re: pattern recognition and verification Richard Loosemore (Sun Sep 18 2005 - 16:13:40 MDT)
• Is complex emergence necessary for intelligence under limited resources? Ben Goertzel (Mon Sep 19 2005 - 08:54:21 MDT)
• RE: Is complex emergence necessary for intelligence under limited resources? H C (Mon Sep 19 2005 - 10:42:33 MDT)
• RE: Is complex emergence necessary for intelligence under limited resources? Phillip Huggan (Mon Sep 19 2005 - 12:26:19 MDT)
• RE: Is complex emergence necessary for intelligence under limited resources? Ben Goertzel (Mon Sep 19 2005 - 12:48:03 MDT)
• Re: Retrenchment Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Mon Sep 19 2005 - 18:09:15 MDT)
• Re: Retrenchment Phil Goetz (Mon Sep 19 2005 - 18:48:04 MDT)
• Re: Is complex emergence necessary for intelligence under limited resources? Olie Lamb (Mon Sep 19 2005 - 18:58:36 MDT)
• Re: Marr's contribution Damien Broderick (Mon Sep 19 2005 - 19:59:59 MDT)
• Re: Is complex emergence necessary for intelligence under limited resources? Olie Lamb (Mon Sep 19 2005 - 20:03:17 MDT)
• INTRO: Rik van Riel Rik van Riel (Mon Sep 19 2005 - 20:10:02 MDT)
• Guidelines on Friendly AI Michael Vassar (Mon Sep 19 2005 - 22:15:36 MDT)
• Re: Guidelines on Friendly AI justin corwin (Mon Sep 19 2005 - 22:31:04 MDT)
• Re: Retrenchment BillK (Tue Sep 20 2005 - 02:04:29 MDT)
• RE: Is complex emergence necessary for AGI? Michael Wilson (Tue Sep 20 2005 - 04:08:11 MDT)
• RE: Is complex emergence necessary for AGI? Ben Goertzel (Tue Sep 20 2005 - 06:59:49 MDT)
• Re: Guidelines on Friendly AI Stephen Reed (Tue Sep 20 2005 - 07:25:48 MDT)
• Re: Is complex emergence necessary for AGI? Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Tue Sep 20 2005 - 13:00:06 MDT)
• Re: Is complex emergence necessary for AGI? Richard Loosemore (Tue Sep 20 2005 - 13:02:20 MDT)
• Re: Is complex emergence necessary for intelligence under limited resources? Richard Loosemore (Tue Sep 20 2005 - 13:05:31 MDT)
• RE: Is complex emergence necessary for AGI? Ben Goertzel (Tue Sep 20 2005 - 13:21:57 MDT)
• RE: Is complex emergence necessary for intelligence under limited resources? Ben Goertzel (Tue Sep 20 2005 - 13:30:13 MDT)
• RE: Is complex emergence necessary for AGI? Ben Goertzel (Tue Sep 20 2005 - 13:34:05 MDT)
• [sl4] Singularity, "happiness", suffering, Mars D Goel (Tue Sep 20 2005 - 13:54:56 MDT)
• Re: Is complex emergence necessary for AGI? Michael Wilson (Tue Sep 20 2005 - 15:16:35 MDT)
• Complexity Theory vs Complex Systems Richard Loosemore (Wed Sep 21 2005 - 07:37:20 MDT)
• Re: Is complex emergence necessary for intelligence under limited resources? Richard Loosemore (Wed Sep 21 2005 - 09:24:26 MDT)
• Re: [sl4] Singularity, "happiness", suffering, Mars D Goel (Wed Sep 21 2005 - 13:45:45 MDT)
• OT: Computers singing. Robin Lee Powell (Wed Sep 21 2005 - 14:35:26 MDT)
• RE: Is complex emergence necessary for intelligence under limited resources? Ben Goertzel (Wed Sep 21 2005 - 18:44:33 MDT)
• sl4 at AC2005 Peter Voss (Wed Sep 21 2005 - 22:54:48 MDT)
• Re: [sl4] Singularity, "happiness", suffering, Mars p3 (Fri Sep 23 2005 - 12:19:34 MDT)
• Re: [sl4] Singularity, "happiness", suffering, Mars Rik van Riel (Sat Sep 24 2005 - 09:03:23 MDT)
• Re: [sl4] Singularity, "happiness", suffering, Mars J. Andrew Rogers (Sat Sep 24 2005 - 10:21:57 MDT)
• Re: [sl4] Singularity, "happiness", suffering, Mars Rik van Riel (Sat Sep 24 2005 - 13:00:17 MDT)
• Re: [sl4] Singularity, "happiness", suffering, Mars p3 (Sun Sep 25 2005 - 13:21:30 MDT)
• Nuclear war is not an existential threat Phil Goetz (Mon Sep 26 2005 - 12:02:35 MDT)
• Re: Nuclear war is not an existential threat Phillip Huggan (Mon Sep 26 2005 - 12:17:58 MDT)
• Re: Nuclear war is not an existential threat Robin Lee Powell (Mon Sep 26 2005 - 12:25:40 MDT)
• Re: Nuclear war is not an existential threat p3 (Mon Sep 26 2005 - 19:49:42 MDT)
• TSIN Research Links Tyler Emerson (Tue Sep 27 2005 - 02:50:32 MDT)
• Re: Nuclear war is not an existential threat J. Andrew Rogers (Tue Sep 27 2005 - 10:57:10 MDT)
• Re: Nuclear war is not an existential threat Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (Tue Sep 27 2005 - 13:33:30 MDT)
• Re: Nuclear war is not an existential threat justin corwin (Tue Sep 27 2005 - 14:55:43 MDT)
• Re: Nuclear war is not an existential threat J. Andrew Rogers (Tue Sep 27 2005 - 15:14:20 MDT)
• Re: Nuclear war is not an existential threat Richard Loosemore (Tue Sep 27 2005 - 18:05:15 MDT)
• Re: Nuclear war is not an existential threat Thomas Buckner (Tue Sep 27 2005 - 18:26:04 MDT)
• What Makes An Idea Viral? (Seth Godin) Tyler Emerson (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 05:14:28 MDT)
• RE: What Makes An Idea Viral? (Seth Godin) Ben Goertzel (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 06:16:07 MDT)
• Re: What Makes An Idea Viral? (Seth Godin) Brian Atkins (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 10:32:49 MDT)
• Re: Nuclear war is not an existential threat Phil Goetz (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 10:48:05 MDT)
• Re: Nuclear war is not an existential threat Phillip Huggan (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 10:56:36 MDT)
• RE: What Makes An Idea Viral? (Seth Godin) pdugan (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 10:59:13 MDT)
• RE: What Makes An Idea Viral? (Seth Godin) Phillip Huggan (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 11:16:38 MDT)
• RE: What Makes An Idea Viral? (Seth Godin) Phil Goetz (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 13:38:17 MDT)
• RE: What Makes An Idea Viral? (Seth Godin) Stuart, Ian (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 14:19:17 MDT)
• LA discussion group justin corwin (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 14:19:36 MDT)
• Re: What Makes An Idea Viral? (Seth Godin) Ralph Cerchione (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 14:47:18 MDT)
• Re: What Makes An Idea Viral? (Seth Godin) Ralph Cerchione (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 16:05:39 MDT)
• Re: Nuclear war is not an existential threat Richard Loosemore (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 16:23:02 MDT)
• Re: What Makes An Idea Viral? (Seth Godin) Damien Broderick (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 16:25:42 MDT)
• RE: What Makes An Idea Viral? (Seth Godin) pdugan (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 18:54:25 MDT)
• KILLTHREAD: Nuclear war is not an existential threat Mitchell Howe (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 20:13:57 MDT)
• RE: What Makes An Idea Viral? (Seth Godin) Pilot Pirx (Wed Sep 28 2005 - 22:41:50 MDT)
• Amazon TSIN Reviews Tyler Emerson (Thu Sep 29 2005 - 03:58:25 MDT)
• RE: Amazon TSIN Reviews Tyler Emerson (Thu Sep 29 2005 - 05:20:54 MDT)
• TSIN blog commentary, log-log plot critique Tyler Emerson (Thu Sep 29 2005 - 13:59:10 MDT)
• Better Interactivity must preceed Singularity pdugan (Thu Sep 29 2005 - 20:38:03 MDT)

Last message date: Fri Sep 07 2012 - 08:45:47 MDT
Archived on: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:14 MDT

269 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Previous Folder, Date view Next Folder, Date view List of Folders

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:14 MDT