Re: Hempel's paradox redux

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (
Date: Thu Sep 15 2005 - 16:24:23 MDT

Russell Wallace wrote:
> On 9/15/05, *Eliezer S. Yudkowsky* <
> <>> wrote:
> Actually, I also need to specify that at least one nonblack object is
> known to exist in every possible world; along with the requirement that,
> in at least one possible world containing nonblack ravens, the ratio of
> these nonblack ravens to all other nonblack objects does not approach
> zero; and the requirement that the proposition "All ravens are black"
> not initially have prior probability equal to zero; in order for my
> general conclusion to hold that randomly sampling a nonblack object and
> finding it to be a nonraven ALWAYS increases the probability assigned to
> the proposition "All ravens are black." (Assuming I haven't missed any
> other necessary assumptions.)
> You also need to assume the world has no structure.
> Suppose in real life you looked around at random, saw a white speck, and
> on closer inspection found it to be a white crow. That's a nonblack
> nonraven, but it would actually count as strong evidence _against_ the
> proposition that all ravens are black: crows and ravens are closely
> related, and if the one species can produce the occasional albino, the
> other probably can too.

Yes, sorry, I'd stated that condition previously but left it out on my

Eliezer S. Yudkowsky                
Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:52 MDT