Simulation argument in the NY Times

From: Eric Rauch (erauch@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Aug 14 2007 - 10:29:31 MDT

• Next message: Matt Mahoney: "Re: Continuing Evolution in Humans (was: A very surreal day)"
• Previous message: Daniel: "Re: Continuing Evolution in Humans (was: A very surreal day)"
• Next in thread: Dagon Gmail: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Reply: Dagon Gmail: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Reply: Mindaugas Indriunas: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Maybe reply: Rick Smith: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Reply: Peter murray: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Maybe reply: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "RE: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I was surprised to see it there.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/14tier.html?ref=science&pagewanted=print

• Next message: Matt Mahoney: "Re: Continuing Evolution in Humans (was: A very surreal day)"
• Previous message: Daniel: "Re: Continuing Evolution in Humans (was: A very surreal day)"
• Next in thread: Dagon Gmail: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Reply: Dagon Gmail: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Reply: Mindaugas Indriunas: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Maybe reply: Rick Smith: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Reply: Peter murray: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Maybe reply: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Maybe reply: Toby Weston: "RE: Simulation argument in the NY Times"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:58 MDT