From: Samantha Atkins (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Jan 09 2004 - 22:58:16 MST
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:55:00 +0900
"Metaqualia" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > OK, I'm not really an animist, I just like the word ;-)
> > I'm a "panpsychist", to use the correct term...
> I am kind of heading in that direction too, kind of incredulously looking
> for some evidence that will discredit this!
Please give a concise definition of panpsychism. What I have seen on line seems to hinge a bit much on "pyschist" phenomenon which are mainly defined in terms of the "paranormal" or outside science. So I am confused. About the best spin I can have on it is some loose notion that all things take part in sentience at some level.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:43 MDT