From: Philip Hunt (cabalamat@googlemail.com)
Date: Sat Nov 29 2008 - 03:29:34 MST
2008/11/28 J. Andrew Rogers <andrew@ceruleansystems.com>:
>
> How do you know what paradigms are needed for AI? And what about the
> paradigms LISP does not do well? Why not use a more paradigm-agile language
> (e.g. Python)?
Surely Lisp is more paradigm-agile than Python, because if Lisp
doesn't support a paradigm, you can extend it until it does, using
macros.
-- Philip Hunt, <cabalamat@googlemail.com> Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:03 MDT