From: J. Andrew Rogers (andrew@ceruleansystems.com)
Date: Fri Nov 28 2008 - 14:22:58 MST
On Nov 28, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Martin Sawitzki wrote:
> My comment is based on the idea that AI needs a programming language
> that implements all paradigms needed for AI. Right now LISP seems to
> be the language with the most (if not all) paradigms known to man,
> but i would not be surprised if new paradigms pop up during AI
> research.
How do you know what paradigms are needed for AI? And what about the
paradigms LISP does not do well? Why not use a more paradigm-agile
language (e.g. Python)? And why applicative functional languages
rather than concatenative functional languages, given their
comparative advantages?
It all seems so arbitrary.
Cheers,
J. Andrew Rogers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:03 MDT