From: Michael Vassar (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Jun 10 2006 - 09:32:24 MDT
He figured it out himself, but www.spaceandgames.com provides the easiest
presentation of the argument argument that I am aware of on the web today.
>From: "Indriunas, Mindaugas" <email@example.com>
>Subject: Re: Confidence in Friendly Singularity
>Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:04:00 +0900
>On 6/10/06, Michael Vassar <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>Have you read much of the SL4 archives OR any significant chunk of the
>>recommended reading OR my recent request for reality checks by any lurkers
>>who think they might have something to contribute?
>>Are you aware that this was more or less Eliezer's belief 8 years ago
>>he recognized that it was totally unfounded?
>Do you mean that Eliezer 8 years ago believed that it is correct to
>set the goal to be "to understand everything", and then it recognized
>that doing it has no logical basis?
>How did that happen? (What were the arguments that made Eliezer
>recognize it was totally unfounded?)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:56 MDT