From: Keith Henson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Feb 24 2006 - 00:37:10 MST
At 01:37 AM 2/24/2006 -0500, Randall Randall wrote:
>You're making a statement including the error correcting
>mechanisms (ECM) which actually exist at the moment, where
>the statement by Eliezer I was responding to was about
>natural selection in general, and I just wanted to point
>out that it seems clear that observed present-day rates
>are not necessarily maximum rates, given that better ECM
One "error correction" is that somewhere between 1/3 and 1/2 of all
conceptions fail to implant.
How much of that is due to mutations in bad places is not known.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 20 2013 - 04:01:04 MDT