From: Phillip Huggan (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Feb 24 2006 - 00:01:17 MST
I still don't see how biophysics at all relates to development of a seed AI's world modelling or incorporation of goal systems. An adult human brain is all hardware while an AGI is slated to run using software. And a human baby cannot recursively self improve. This is the wrong place to look for seed AI size estimations. Wheat can't think!!
Keith Henson <email@example.com> wrote: At 08:22 AM 2/23/2006 -0500, Richard wrote:
>Ditto for the amount of information in the DNA that triggers the
>development of a brain.
I don't see (prior to birth anyway) where more information comes from.
If you don't have other information input, then a zygote is a NI (natural
intelligence) seed. I can't think of an AI researcher in the world who
would not be *delighted* with an AI that had the potential of a baby.
If you look at it in this light, then the information content of a seed AI
with human level potential should not be more than the information content
of the human genome and is probably a good deal less.
It just a question of bits, of course the question is *which bits.*
Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:56 MDT