From: Robin Lee Powell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:47:36 MST
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 01:18:24AM -0500, S?bastien Chikara wrote:
> Here's the latest flippant argument I had against the singularity
> "One of the most common fallacies people fall into is to assume any
> given trend will retain its current path forever. It ain't so."
Of course not. That's the *point*. Technological progress can't
continue forever at its current snails pace; not with every new
technology helping to create the next one.
> p.s. he also mentionned Wired's Fieldguide To Transhumanists
> http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.04/start.html?pg=12 but as far
> as generalities goes... i have to agree this one is rather funny.
As a moderate libertarian and a non-moderate singularitarian, I have to
say that the "who gets laid" is skewed rather the other way. Sure,
Extropians go to rave, but watch some of the smarter sigularitarians at
a sci-fi con some time...
All assuming males, of course. 8P
-Robin, who has two gfs. 8)
-- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:42 MDT