Re: In defense of Friendliness

From: Samantha Atkins (
Date: Sat Oct 19 2002 - 23:30:38 MDT

Aaron McBride wrote:
> At 07:59 PM 10/18/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>> It is not at all friendly. It is also very unimaginative. The people
>> would not be happy.
>> - samantha
> I'm pretty sure the people *would* be happy. That is the definition of
> "blissed-out wire-head type state." (at least as I understand it)
> You can't just say "I wouldn't be happy with someone/something forcing
> me to be happy." Yes you would... by definition. You could argue that
> you (wire-headed) isn't you (now).

I have been blissed out in various ways. It is not enough. You
assume your idea of wirehead bliss would enough by definition if
you want. I have my doubts.

- samantha

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:41 MDT