the singularity is *really* near (just 4.25 years away)

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sat Jan 19 2002 - 18:59:08 MST

• Next message: Damien Broderick: ""Paths to the Singularity""
• Previous message: Dan Clemmensen: "Re: Steve Harris, "Return of the Krell Machine" (Singularity Article)"
• In reply to: Dan Clemmensen: "Re: Steve Harris, "Return of the Krell Machine" (Singularity Article)"
• Next in thread: Dan Clemmensen: "Re: the singularity is *really* near (just 4.25 years away)"
• Reply: Dan Clemmensen: "Re: the singularity is *really* near (just 4.25 years away)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 11:58 AM 1/19/02 -0500, Dan Clemmensen wrote:

>AI may not be the
>only path to SI. I feel that we'll get SI via human-computer
>collaboration.

By May 2006, right? Do you feel the hot breath of time on your neck, Dan?
Still standing by that prediction?

Damien Broderick

• Next message: Damien Broderick: ""Paths to the Singularity""
• Previous message: Dan Clemmensen: "Re: Steve Harris, "Return of the Krell Machine" (Singularity Article)"
• In reply to: Dan Clemmensen: "Re: Steve Harris, "Return of the Krell Machine" (Singularity Article)"
• Next in thread: Dan Clemmensen: "Re: the singularity is *really* near (just 4.25 years away)"
• Reply: Dan Clemmensen: "Re: the singularity is *really* near (just 4.25 years away)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:37 MDT