From: Brian Atkins (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Jun 23 2001 - 13:57:22 MDT
"Amara D. Angelica" wrote:
> Dani Eder said:
> >The latest list of the top 500 supercomputers in the
> >world has just been published (www.top500.org). The
> >sum of all 500 machines now is at 108 Tflops, which,
> >using Moravec's estimate, is equivalent to 1.08 human
> >brain power.
> Ray Kurzweil estimates 20,000 TF/s for human
> brain power, based on a nominal neural-firing speed
> of 200 instructions per second for each connection
> (100 TF/s x 200). This is 200 times higher
> than Hans Moravec's figure, which doesn't include the
> neural-firing speed.
> Kurzweil estimates that "supercomputers will achieve
> one human brain capacity by 2010, and personal computers
> will do so by around 2020."
And yet he also points out in recent presentations that it may be
possible to implement human-equivalent functionality using 1000 times
less "power" in computers. He gives an example of the auditory
Do you ever get the feeling there is a bit of cognitive dissonance
there with him? He seems to want to have a human-centric future, even
out past 2030, yet the technology trends don't seem to point that way
when you look closely... hopefully this dissonance will lead him to
a more SL4 kind of reasoning. Or perhaps he is simply presenting a more
conservative side in public?
-- Brian Atkins Director, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence http://www.intelligence.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:36 MDT