From: Thomas McCabe (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Jan 30 2008 - 20:01:40 MST
On Jan 30, 2008 3:21 PM, Joshua Fox <email@example.com> wrote:
> Tom and Kaj,
> Thanks for this effort, and I look forward to seeing this online. Be sure to
> do copy-editing first, though, for style and brevity.
> Some comments:
> > * SIAI will just putz around and never actually finish the project, like
> all the other wild-eyed dreamers.
> > o This, I think, is a real, serious risk. - Tom
> The SIAI needs hard-headed business-like management alongside the wild-eyed
> dreaming. Tyler with the team has made good progress -- more is needed.
SIAI received more than $500,000 last year. The main concern now is
what we're going to spend it on.
> > * There's no idea in treating seriously an institution whose leader and
> only full-time researcher is a middle-school drop-out without a single
> peer-reviewed publication.
> > o Incidentally, this might be one of the rare objections that it's better
> to just quietly ignore than try to answer...
> Of course, you can't just ignore an objection, if it means the SIAI will get
> suffer in various ways like not getting donations.
The idea is that if we don't mention it, people simply won't bring it
up. Eli's history isn't commonly known, after all.
> > I don't know if any answer will satisfy those who only look for formal
> credentials before
> > respecting someone, and there's no point in highlighting the issue. - Kaj
> I very much respect Eliezer (and donate to SIAI), but that's because I read
> hundreds of pages of his and other's writings. You can't expect all
> potential supporters to do that.
> If I heard of an innovative but off-beat cancer research institute whose
> lead researcher is a middle-school drop-out with no peer-reviewed
> publications, I wouldn't have the time or ability to compare his approach
> against with more mainstream and credentialed scientists. I'd prefer to
> direct my donations to the latter, and I'd be right to do so.
SIAI usually gets a few big donations from dedicated Singularitarians,
rather than lots of small donations from people who don't really
understand the Singularity or FAI.
> > those two chapters for Global Catastrophic Risks, which were technically
> In academia, book chapters are considered to be at a lower level of prestige
> in terms of peer review.
> SIAI has addressed the issue of credentials by adding Ben Goertzel and other
> PhD's to its team. A further step might be to publish SIAI-funded work in
> peer-reviewed journals.
> The scientific community demands that researchers pump out articles for a
> reason -- it is a metric of performance; not a good one, but one of the few
> we have. I am not suggesting that Eliezer pumps out low-quality work, but I
> am suggesting that we treat the mainstream "establishment" scientific
> process with respect and see if SIAI can (partially) fit into it.
SIAI is currently funding the OpenCog project (opencog.org). It should
come online later this spring.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:01 MDT