Re: Investing in FAI research: now vs. later

From: Rolf Nelson (rolf.h.d.nelson@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Jan 27 2008 - 08:43:26 MST

• Next message: Thomas McCabe: "Singularity Objections"
• Previous message: Matt Mahoney: "Re: Evidence that the universe is simulated"
• Maybe in reply to: Rolf Nelson: "Investing in FAI research: now vs. later"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Oops thanks, I meant that the AGI risk is on the order of a million times
larger, not the asteroid risk.

On Jan 26, 2008 5:14 PM, Tim Freeman <tim@fungible.com> wrote:

> From: "Rolf Nelson" <rolf.h.d.nelson@gmail.com>
> >However, the ratio between AGI existential risk and killer-asteroid risk
> in
> >this century has got to be on the order of one to a million!*
>
> Are you saying the AGI risk is a million times larger, or the asteroid
> risk?
>
> I invite you to post any response to sl4@sl4.org.
> --
> Tim Freeman http://www.fungible.com
> tim@fungible.com
>

• Next message: Thomas McCabe: "Singularity Objections"
• Previous message: Matt Mahoney: "Re: Evidence that the universe is simulated"
• Maybe in reply to: Rolf Nelson: "Investing in FAI research: now vs. later"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:01 MDT