Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility
From: Mike Dougherty (msd001@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Mar 08 2007 - 15:12:44 MST
- Next message: James MacAulay: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Previous message: Gordon Worley: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- In reply to: Gordon Worley: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Next in thread: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Reply: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
On 3/7/07, Gordon Worley <redbird@mac.com> wrote:
> An additional issue to consider: suppose such a device is
> constructed, but then as the nesting approaches infinity, the
> universes converge to a universe where the device is not
> constructed. In other words, is the space of universes complete? I
> see no reason why they must be, but then I have a very poor
> mathematical model of a universe.
Imagining the 10th dimension:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2u4CFTZtcXE (part1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmwrhO3-BN0 (part2)
Simple progression up to 10 dimensions. No advanced math required.
- Next message: James MacAulay: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Previous message: Gordon Worley: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- In reply to: Gordon Worley: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Next in thread: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Reply: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:57 MDT