STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility
From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Tue Feb 27 2007 - 20:18:00 MST
- Next message: Norman Noman: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Previous message: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: Skeptic Article about AI"
- Next in thread: Norman Noman: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Reply: Norman Noman: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Reply: Gordon Worley: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Reply: James MacAulay: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
http://qntm.org/responsibility
I rather like this story's reasoning. Especially the fixed-point
theorem and its exploitation. I point out, however, that you can also
get stability with an N-cycle.
--
Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://intelligence.org/
Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
- Next message: Norman Noman: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Previous message: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: Skeptic Article about AI"
- Next in thread: Norman Noman: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Reply: Norman Noman: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Reply: Gordon Worley: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Reply: James MacAulay: "Re: STORY: I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:57 MDT