Re: the end of fermi's paradox?

From: Chris Petersen (moses2k@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Jan 04 2007 - 21:30:45 MST


Elihu, there's the matter of setting up a 'useful' computation. Even if the
system is self-sustaining once it gets going, there's still that initial
energy investment to consider.

kevin, exotic physics and ontotech is sci-fi, not SIAI FAI. ;)

-Chris

On 1/4/07, Elihu Herskovics <froho7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/4/07, Philip Goetz <philgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > But creating information does take energy.
> > There is a precise relationship between bits and energy, though I
> > don't understand it.
> >
>
> I don't remember his source, but somewhere in Kurzwiel's "the singularity
> is near" he brings up that theoretically, zero energy is required for
> computation (example, a rock is constantly "computing" the positions of it's
> component molecules at zero energy cost), and that the only energy needed is
> for output to external systems and for correcting errors caused by things
> like cosmic rays.
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:57 MDT