Re: The Conjunction Fallacy Fallacy

From: Russell Wallace (
Date: Tue Aug 29 2006 - 06:53:22 MDT

On 8/29/06, John K Clark <> wrote:
> As I said before my respect for Eliezer is unbounded, but when somebody
> refuses to debate a point in those book length works on cognitive I don't
> know how else to interpret it.

Rather than continuing that argument, having established that Eliezer et al
are willing to debate it if you have something new to say on the substantive
topic in question, assuming you do have something new, why not go ahead and
say it? (I suspect I disagree with both of you on the matter, but would be
curious if you have reasons for your view.)

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:57 MDT