From: Olie Lamb (email@example.com)
Date: Tue May 16 2006 - 19:37:20 MDT
On 5/16/06, Tennessee Leeuwenburg <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I propose that we take this the hell out of SL4 and into some
> philoso-ranting list.
Your 4 point summary of my post, though appropriate was a little off,
tho. Try this:
Olie: boggles at the proclaimed <strike>relativist</strike>
<strike>nihilist</strike> moral sceptic who says "Don't impose your
morality on anyone else, so I think that AGI should use _These_ rules"
> As you can see, this problem boils down to two things:
> (a) Debates about morality
> (b) Understanding AGI
> I suggest that (a) is not SL4 or easily solvable, and that (b) is what we
> should concern ourself with?
I do think that AGI should be our main concern.
But morality is relevant to Friendlyness, and discussions that /add/
to Friendlyness might be useful. This one aint.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:56 MDT