From: Phil Goetz (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jan 12 2006 - 13:53:26 MST
--- "Eliezer S. Yudkowsky" <email@example.com> wrote:
> Michael Vassar wrote:
> > Those assumptions may be wrong.
> > I don't even know how, as a human, to assign a probability to the
> > possibility that they are wrong.
> > But I do know that if they are wrong then "everything I know is
> It is only because psi is not real that you think
> that psi would invalidate everything, and it is because psi would
> invalidate everything that you think it is not real. This is, in
> cold sober fact, circular logic, or more kindly a consistent
> and there is the possibility of both arcs of the loop being
I think Michael's larger - and valid - point was that discussion of psi
on SL4 lowers the probably-signal-to-probably-noise ratio on a mailing
list that is already irritatingly full of speculative philosophical hot air.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:55 MDT