From: Ben Goertzel (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Jul 25 2005 - 11:59:21 MDT
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:58:16PM +0100, Russell Wallace wrote:
> > What I can say is that _to the extent that the system forces
> > everyone to submit to the will of the Collective_ (as was implied
> > by the original paper, a position you seem to be partly retreating
> > from now - if you are retreating from that position, good), you're
> > proposing to create Hell.
> Collective Volition *NEVER* proposed that. "The will of the
> collective" and "the extrapolated volition of the collective" have
> little or nothing in common with each other.
But Robin, isn't
"the extrapolated vision of the collective"
basically a rephrasing of
"the will of the 'Collective Volition Extrapolation Machine' (as possibly
filtered by a Last Judge)"
I think that is what Russell meant by "the will of the Collective".
I don't agree with Russell that this is necessarilly Hell.
However, it is quite different than explicitly positing some particular
value (like e.g. some better-specified version of 'a reasonably degree of
freedom for sentients') as guidance for the post-Singularity uber-AI...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:51 MDT