From: Samantha Atkins (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Apr 07 2005 - 21:14:47 MDT
Really? Michael's message didn't look much like that was what was
being said to me.
On Apr 7, 2005 6:19 PM, Peter de Blanc <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 17:28 -0700, Samantha Atkins wrote:
> > So are you saying that the VPOP cannot dependably be expected to think
> > before acting as it simply has no such distinction? If true this
> > would be a strong reason not to build such a thing.
> The point is that you shouldn't make an RPOP with the supergoal of
> forming predictions and then try to enslave it to some external decision
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:51 MDT