From: Robin Lee Powell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Mar 15 2005 - 12:29:25 MST
That's nice. Can he argue ethics with you as well?
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:07:04AM -0800, Lee Corbin wrote:
> Spike is entirely correct.
> This five year old
> could give me nine stones and win almost every time
> (I am only 3rd que or so, and have "only" spent about
> a thousand hours playing Go).
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Robin Lee
> > Powell
> > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 10:18 PM
> > To: email@example.com
> > Subject: Re: Overconfidence and meta-rationality
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:53:56PM -0800, spike wrote:
> > > Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
> > > > ...quite absurd to suppose that a lone five-year-old could face
> > > > down full adult intelligences and win...
> > >
> > > Chess players get this if they start very young and have talent.
> > > If a sharp 8 year old can spank all the adults he knows,
> > Erm.
> > 5 year old != 8 year old, in several profound and important ways.
> > -Robin
> > --
> > http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
> > Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
> > Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://intelligence.org/
-- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://intelligence.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:50 MDT