From: Lee Corbin (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Mar 15 2005 - 01:07:04 MST
Spike is entirely correct.
This five year old
could give me nine stones and win almost every time
(I am only 3rd que or so, and have "only" spent about
a thousand hours playing Go).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of Robin Lee
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 10:18 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Overconfidence and meta-rationality
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:53:56PM -0800, spike wrote:
> > Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
> > > ...quite absurd to suppose that a lone five-year-old could face
> > > down full adult intelligences and win...
> > Chess players get this if they start very young and have talent.
> > If a sharp 8 year old can spank all the adults he knows,
> 5 year old != 8 year old, in several profound and important ways.
> http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
> Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
> Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 20 2013 - 04:00:31 MDT