From: Robin Lee Powell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Mar 04 2005 - 00:31:20 MST
Yes, including the standard of "Don't bother replying to something a
week old that the rest of us ignored so it would go away."
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 10:07:44PM -0800, Samantha Atkins wrote:
> huh? Are all list standards dead?
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:07:16 -0800 (PST), p3 <email@example.com> wrote:
> > I just bought this book for fifty cents at a garage sell. I was thinking
> > about reading it, but then I noticed that it was highly praised (in the
> > "quotes", or whatever you call them, found in the first few pages of books)
> > by the Christian Science Monitor.
> > On the one hand, R. Buckminster Fuller is high-fiving this book, while at
> > the same time it is being praised by a publication founded by a lady who
> > thought there was no physical world and that disease was part of the
> > imagination.
> > I'll probably read it anyway in my unending quest for information, but
> > before I do, has anyone else here read it (I am assuming that is a given)?
> > Is it good? And so on.
> > Thank you.
> > "...Learn to see, and then you'll know that there is no end to the new
> > worlds of our vision." Carlos Castaneda A SEPARATE REALITY
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
-- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://intelligence.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:50 MDT