**From:** Russell Wallace (*russell.wallace@gmail.com*)

**Date:** Sat Jan 22 2005 - 11:33:23 MST

**Next message:**maru: "Re: Bad Bayesian - no biscuit!"**Previous message:**Ben Goertzel: "RE: What are qualia..."**In reply to:**Patrick Crenshaw: "Re: maybe we are in pi"**Next in thread:**Thomas Buckner: "Re: maybe we are in pi"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:13:21 -0500, Patrick Crenshaw

<patrick.crenshaw@gmail.com> wrote:

*> Actually, if you look at the amount of Kolmogorov complexity in a
*

*> number like pi, you'll see that it isn't very great. Far too little to
*

*> contain anything like our universe.
*

Yes, but the Kolmogorov complexity of pi *plus a specified digit

range* can be arbitrarily large, enough to specify any finite body of

information (if it is the case that every finite digit sequence occurs

somewhere in the expansion of pi, which AFAIK is conjectured but not

proven).

- Russell

**Next message:**maru: "Re: Bad Bayesian - no biscuit!"**Previous message:**Ben Goertzel: "RE: What are qualia..."**In reply to:**Patrick Crenshaw: "Re: maybe we are in pi"**Next in thread:**Thomas Buckner: "Re: maybe we are in pi"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:50 MDT
*