Re: Qualia feel good?

From: Eugen Leitl (eugen@leitl.org)
Date: Tue Jul 06 2004 - 23:31:47 MDT


On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:42:53AM +0200, Tomaz Kristan wrote:

> Don't bother to define qualia, we *know* what it is.

Why bother with a "theory" that's not even wrong?

What predictions can I make from quales? Are they a useful source of
engineering constraints, as compared to, say, neuroanatomy, or computational
physics? How much list bandwidth and people-attention-seconds are worth
allocated to such a concept? (And can I have some of them back, please?)

If a quale quails in a quale, quales a quale quale?

-- 
Eugen* Leitl leitl
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144            http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
http://moleculardevices.org         http://nanomachines.net




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:47 MDT