From: Eugen Leitl (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jul 06 2004 - 23:31:47 MDT
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:42:53AM +0200, Tomaz Kristan wrote:
> Don't bother to define qualia, we *know* what it is.
Why bother with a "theory" that's not even wrong?
What predictions can I make from quales? Are they a useful source of
engineering constraints, as compared to, say, neuroanatomy, or computational
physics? How much list bandwidth and people-attention-seconds are worth
allocated to such a concept? (And can I have some of them back, please?)
If a quale quails in a quale, quales a quale quale?
-- Eugen* Leitl leitl ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:47 MDT