Re: Qualia feel good? (was: "feels good" is inherently...)

From: Metaqualia (metaqualia@mynichi.com)
Date: Mon Jul 05 2004 - 19:28:32 MDT

• Next message: Metaqualia: "Re: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Previous message: Ben Goertzel: "RE: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• In reply to: Elias Sinderson: "Qualia feel good? (was: "feels good" is inherently...)"
• Next in thread: Elias Sinderson: "Re: Qualia feel good?"
• Reply: Elias Sinderson: "Re: Qualia feel good?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> >I don't have a particular definition of qualia (who does?) [...] I think
we can all agree on what
>qualia are?
> Surely you must be joking...

Not joking, I stand by my statements.

mq

• Next message: Metaqualia: "Re: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Previous message: Ben Goertzel: "RE: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• In reply to: Elias Sinderson: "Qualia feel good? (was: "feels good" is inherently...)"
• Next in thread: Elias Sinderson: "Re: Qualia feel good?"
• Reply: Elias Sinderson: "Re: Qualia feel good?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 21 2006 - 04:22:42 MST