Qualia feel good? (was: "feels good" is inherently...)

From: Elias Sinderson (elias@cse.ucsc.edu)
Date: Mon Jul 05 2004 - 11:08:01 MDT

• Next message: mike99: "RE: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Previous message: fudley: "Re: The AIbox."
• In reply to: Metaqualia: "Re: "feels good" is inherently meaningful"
• Next in thread: Metaqualia: "Re: Qualia feel good? (was: "feels good" is inherently...)"
• Reply: Metaqualia: "Re: Qualia feel good? (was: "feels good" is inherently...)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Metaqualia wrote:

>I don't have a particular definition of qualia (who does?) [...] I think we can all agree on what qualia are?
>
Surely you must be joking...

Regards,
Elias

• Next message: mike99: "RE: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Previous message: fudley: "Re: The AIbox."
• In reply to: Metaqualia: "Re: "feels good" is inherently meaningful"
• Next in thread: Metaqualia: "Re: Qualia feel good? (was: "feels good" is inherently...)"
• Reply: Metaqualia: "Re: Qualia feel good? (was: "feels good" is inherently...)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 21 2006 - 04:22:42 MST