From: Mike (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Jun 17 2004 - 18:35:16 MDT
On the WIKI, you said "To construe your volition, I need to define a
dynamic for extrapolating your volition, given knowledge about you." So
I asked the question several times of how you were going to collect that
knowledge. Now you're saying all you need is a definition of future
collective volition, and the AI will make it all right? I don't see
where MY current volition ever enters into that equation.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf
> Of Eliezer Yudkowsky
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 6:35 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: On specific input mechanisms
> and then the AI will
> interrogate the
> programmers to improve its models of them in particular and
> thereby humans
> in general, and work its way up to an offline static copy of
> the Internet,
> and my guess is that when it grows up at least two direct
> brainscans would be a good idea...
> But it doesn't matter.
> Once you define the thing-that-you-want-to-approximate - the
> volition - then you just point the RPOP at the invariant and
> say, "Guess."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:47 MDT