From: Paul Hughes (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:44:02 MDT
--- Eliezer Yudkowsky <email@example.com> wrote:
> In 2003 I tried to be Belldandy, sweetness and
> light. It didn't work...
> Striving toward total rationality and total
> altruism comes easily to me.
> Sweetness and light doesn't; I tried and failed.
> And ya know
> what? I'm arrogant. I'll try not to be an arrogant
> bastard, but I'm
> definitely arrogant... I will try
> not to be such an ass as
> Newton, try hard not to actually *hurt* anyone, but
> let's face it, I am not
> one of the modest geniuses. The best I can do is
> recognize this and move on...
> Isn't it enough that we save
> the world? Do we have to
> be frickin' *modest* about it? Now that just seems
> unreasonable. How are
> we supposed to stay sane?
So, are you saying that you are not sane?
You seem to be admitting that you are both rational
AND irrational. Emotional outbursts, arrogance,
self-descriptors of "MAD scientists" all indicate some
kind of irrationality and insanity, while you
simultaneously say rationality comes easy to you.
Could you please explain the discrepancy?
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:47 MDT