From: Jonathan Standley (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Apr 28 2003 - 12:00:46 MDT
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of Barkley Vowk
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: Infinite universe
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Paul Hughes wrote:
> In the last 20 years I have yet to see a single major
> advance on the nature of the universe not fit within
> my intuitional insights of how I suspected the
> universe works.
> Intution alone may not solve the problem, but in cases
> like this it has always leads me in the right
> direction, which in turn was invariably and logically
> demonstrated by myself or others.
Thank You. Hell, you people *TAUGHT* me
Given your training, I'd say it would be impossible to separate your
"intuition" from your training the in current models and ability to reason
within that framework. It seems obvious that the universe fits your models
when you think "through" those models. This would be valid if the universe
was intuitive to a child, not to a man who digests and applies
mathematical models to the universe for a living.
Ok I admit to fatal errors in the post. Never said I was perfect, I'm glad
What *OTHER* than hardcore math (a very valuable thing, a survival trait.
No kidding) ??
Ever lived in the ghetto and worked minimum wage *by your own volition*?
PLEASE GO HERE (PLEASE) NOW: http://www.gnufans.net/ai.pl?SeedAiTeam The
Dam Has Cracks. Watch BBC for an hour today and then cast stones.
Domo Arigoto (IIRC)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:42 MDT