From: Samantha Atkins (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2002 - 03:03:37 MDT
Ben Goertzel wrote:
> As you say, cryonics is available now, at a reasonably modest cost --
> for middle-class Americans -- through life-insurance.
> I don't think it's available outside the US, and even in the US it's out
> of reach for the lower-income segments of the population.
> So I guess the right statement is: "There's no reason for middle or
> upper class Americans to die permanently right now, except in case of
> severely brain-destroying accidents, or deaths that occur in very remote
Is there a point to this straining at a gnat that eludes me?
Cryonics is not zero-cost yet nor universally available. Does
that mean the option itself does not exist or should not be
acknowledged until it is universally available?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:40 MDT