From: Ben Goertzel (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Jun 26 2002 - 16:29:40 MDT
James, you may well be right, his posts were long and hard to comprehend and
I may have read them too quickly
Apologies if my reply was based on a misinterpretation!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf
> Of James Higgins
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:51 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: FAI and SIAI as dangerous
> At 03:35 PM 6/26/2002 -0600, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> >About Eugen's suggestion that FAI and SIAI are dangerous...
> I'm sorry, and I'm not making a statement either way, but somehow
> I managed
> to miss where Eugen said FAI & SIAI are dangerous.
> What I read from him appears to mean that the development, as it is
> currently being conducted, is dangerous. Which I would, in general,
> probably agree with. I don't think he means to indicate that the
> effort as
> a whole should not proceed. We've exchanged a few private emails and I
> don't get that impression, though I could easily be incorrect.
> Just my 2 cents worth.
> James Higgins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:39 MDT