Re: autonomic computing

From: Brian Atkins (brian@posthuman.com)
Date: Tue Oct 16 2001 - 11:26:28 MDT


Well I think the more overall problem IBM is targetting here is software
and system complexity- they want to find ways to allow for "bigger stuff"
that still runs smoothly. I have a very strong feeling that someone should
show them Flare, perhaps they would be interested in helping out.

Aaron McBride wrote:
>
> http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1277-210-7506099-1.html
>
> Possibly a meme we should be promoting.
>
> "
> First, to be autonomic, a system needs to "know itself" and compromise
> components that also possess a system identity.
> An autonomic system never settles for the status quo; it always looks for
> ways to optimize.
> An autonomic system must configure and reconfigure itself under varying and
> unpredictable conditions.
> An autonomic system must be its own doctor; it must be able to recover from
> routine and extraordinary events that might cause some parts to malfunction.
> An autonomic computing system must be an expert in self-protection.
> An autonomic computing system knows its environment and the context
> surrounding its activity, and acts accordingly.
> An autonomic system cannot exist in a hermetic environment and must adhere
> to open standards.
> An autonomic computing system will anticipate the optimized resources needed
> to meet a user's information needs while keeping its complexity hidden from
> the user. "
>
> Sounds a lot like a Seed-AI to me.
>
> "IBM will open up a substantial grant program with more than 50 grants
> available to support this effort." Any way we could get our hands on some of
> this money?
>
> Someone may also want to contact this author when the time is right for broad
> announcements.
>
> -Aaron

-- 
Brian Atkins
Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
http://www.intelligence.org/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:37 MDT