Re: Opting out of the Sysop scenario?

From: Brian Phillips (
Date: Mon Aug 13 2001 - 18:37:12 MDT

----- Original Message -----
From: Marc Forrester <>
> My brain creates entirely convincing 'non-player characters' several times
> night without performing any hall-of-mirrors tricks to host extra
> beings within this one. For the illusion to work, it is enough that
> characters talk and act in ways that -you- expect them to, and that
> information can be read from your own mind without needing to create any
> others.
This fact is one thing that supports my hunch that something resembling the
classic cyberpunk neural-interface is rather closer than we suspect. We
already have a perfectly good "VR" generator..we just have to determine
a sufficently predictable method of stimulating it. :)
  Here's an interesting thought... if VR piggy-backed onto the REM-dream
channels in the brain.. the people who are getting disability for severe
narcolepsy might suddenly find themselves a hot job commodity.
  Clinical narcolepsy is not defined as a propensity to fall asleep multiple's defined as haveing 2 or more episodes of REM activity witin
a nap allowed in a given day, as determined by the Multiple Sleep Latency
Test. Someone who has a tendancy to go REM in a casual nap...
ka ching $$$$.
  The even weirder thing about this is imagining a human's perception of
the Sysop ..if the primary method of interface involved REM processes.
Shades of the Sandman....
  but with nano.

"the future will turn strange...soon"
 brian .....

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:37 MDT