From: Xavier Lumine (dmyshkin@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 01 2001 - 15:29:50 MDT
I can contribute web design/programming if you decide to do that.
Dmitriy
>From: "Ben Goertzel" <ben@webmind.com>
>Reply-To: sl4@sysopmind.com
>To: <sl4@sysopmind.com>
>Subject: RE: Article: The coming superintelligence: who will be in control?
>Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 16:08:15 -0400
>
>
>Amara helped me edit an article I wrote on Webmind for the site, but the
>"powers that be" at kurzweilai.net wouldn't let it appear -- ostensibly
>because of the "commercial" aspects of Webmind, but I don't believe that
>was
>the real reason (after all, Webmind Inc. no longer exists, WM is being
>developed by a bunch of us working for free at the moment). I think that
>Ray Kurzweil is a genuine visionary, but that he has a relatively narrow
>vision of how the Singularity is going to be, and that his site is REALLY
>devoted to promoting that narrow vision, although it's positioned as a
>general site about AI and the future. This doesn't mean that interesting
>stuff going beyond Kurzweil's particular views can't get on the site, but
>it
>does mean that getting such things on there takes a lot of care. Frankly,
>I
>think we'd have a better chance of starting our own site and getting really
>deep content up that way. Obviously, there are many people on this list
>who
>could contribute significantly to such a site, but we would require ONE
>person who wanted to devote a significant chunk of their time to keeping
>the
>thing going.
>
>-- Ben G
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sl4@sysopmind.com [mailto:owner-sl4@sysopmind.com]On Behalf
> > Of Brian Atkins
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 4:00 PM
> > To: sl4@sysopmind.com
> > Subject: Re: Article: The coming superintelligence: who will be in
> > control?
> >
> >
> > What I really find lacking at the Kurzweilai.net site are some articles
> > going beyond trend tracking and guessing what will happen. I'd like to
>see
> > people take the issue farther and try to figure out a) can we manipulate
> > the timing and character of the Singularity significantly b) if so,
>should
> > we accelerate it? Perhaps Amara could do an article on that with some
> > of our help? Of course all singularitarians realize the responsibility
> > to take action to support and accelerate the Singularity safely, but
>many
> > other people seem to either not have considered this yet, or are content
> > to sit back and "let history take its course", which IMO is not
>rational.
> >
> > Peter Voss wrote:
> > >
> > > For those of you who haven't seen this on KurzweilAi.net
> > >
> > > "The coming superintelligence: who will be in control?"
> > >
> > > http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0223.html
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > www.optimal.org - Any and all feedback welcome: peter@optimal.org
> >
> > --
> > Brian Atkins
> > Director, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
> > http://www.intelligence.org/
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:37 MDT