Date: Mon Jun 18 2001 - 02:41:51 MDT
> You'll note from my full, proper citation that the word definition I
> To make this an SL4 topic, we could talk about the possibility of a
> lang uage that cannot be misinterpreted. Is such a language possible?
A professor invented one of these called "loglan" (sp?). Like esperanto, it
never managed to get as far as national languages. As far as singularity-speak,
I anticipate people might talk in XML or (even better?) via some trans-logical
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:36 MDT