From: Ben Goertzel (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Nov 18 2000 - 21:32:43 MST
> > Webmind would need to realize that it had more pain than it
> would have had
> > otherwise, trace back the causality for that to the action of the human,
> > categorize the presence of "more pain than in a subjunctive alternate
> > reality" as "undesirable" (regardless of the purpose that pain
> is supposed
> > to accomplish), and combine the fact of "human responsibility" with the
> > "undesirable outcome" to resent the humans.
> This kind of reasoning is really not very hard for a probababilistic
> engine like the one implicit in WM's inheritance links, given adequate
> data. I mean, I could write out the exact inference steps involved in the
> of thought you describe, in terms of WM nodes and links (but I won't...).
> We have
> not achieved this kind of application of WM inference yet,
But we have achieved MORE complex reasoning, just not tied to the
learning aspect as in your example...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:35 MDT