From: Eric Burton (brilanon@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 12 2012 - 11:45:08 MDT
Actually you might do the sums of three runs in a row not two, to see
it. Here it is in short
> 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 4096 8192
> highest
> run
> 1 2 4 8 7 5 10 11 13 8 7 14 19 20
> highest
> run
> 1 2 4 8 7 5 1 2 4 8 7 5 10 2 2 4 8 7 5 10 2
> highest
> run
1 2 4 8 7 5 1 2 4 8 7 5 1 2 2 4 8 7 5 1 2 5 1
2 2 4 8 7 5 1 2
So you take the sums of the digits in powers of 2. The sums of the
digits in that. And the sums of the digits in -that-. You get the
magic 487-512 number where, every sum is a single digit and there is
no further series to produce.
Oh no wow
I have some chocolate in the fridge
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Eric Burton <brilanon@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks tom. This 487 512 thing. I'm stuck on it. Look
>
> 12 487 512 487 512 487 512 487
> 512 487 512 487 512 4487 512 487
>
> Then a six
>
> I don't know dude like if you take the sums of the digits of powers of 2
>
> Then the sums of the digits in the results
>
> You get that O_O printed for a long time
>
> I mean really wow
>
> But I will stop
>
> I should get a blog...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:06 MDT