From: Glenn Neff (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Dec 07 2009 - 05:33:48 MST
--- On Mon, 12/7/09, Panu Horsmalahti <email@example.com> wrote:
> From: Panu Horsmalahti <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: [sl4] I saved the world. I can prove it.
> To: email@example.com
> Date: Monday, December 7, 2009, 12:10 PM
> 2009/12/7 Glenn Neff <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> It seems that you haven't read about any of the basic
> texts involving this subject, however, you're confused
> about what people (especially people on sl4 and related
> "memecomplexes" want to do. Their goal is to
> create a "Friendly AI", which by definition is not
> dangerous. And they want to create it quickly, because the
> more they wait, the more there's chance that something
> kills everyone (which is also called an existential risk).
> - Panu H.
So you've got everything covered then?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought there was a risk that the AI might *not* be friendly, despite all the smartest peoples' best efforts.
And the point that I was trying to make is that we are facing an existential risk right now . . . so unless you've got that friendly AI ready to go *right* *now*, we need a different plan. What I am trying to accomplish in bringing this to your attention is to make sure that Evil people are not in control of the world when said AI is developed.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:05 MDT