From: John K Clark (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Dec 04 2009 - 11:00:01 MST
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 "Stuart Armstrong" <email@example.com>
said in a VERY puzzling post.
> You are claiming an impossibility theorem - quantum effects
> have no significant effect on consciousness, with probability one
What the hell are you talking about? I made no such claim.
> Second, if AI is possible on traditional computers (which I believe,
> with probability 0.999), and quantum computing is possible
> (probability 0.99999), [blah blah]
Maybe quantum mechanics has something to do with intelligence, maybe
not, who cares, it has nothing to do with what we were talking about.
> Thirdly, appealing to chaos theory, you can get great macroscopic
> stability in the outcomes of certain differential equations. It
> therefore seems pretty likely that you could implement the AI above in
> such a way that it is resilient to macroscopic shocks.
Frankly my dear I don't give a damn. You are asking me to defend things
I never said, don't believe, and are irrelevant.
John K Clark
-- John K Clark firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 25 2013 - 04:01:26 MDT