From: John K Clark (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Dec 03 2009 - 09:42:32 MST
On Thu, 3 Dec 200 "Stuart Armstrong" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > I assume that you are referring to the no clone theorem, which says
> > that it is impossible to perfectly duplicate a given quantum state.
> > However, this ultimate level of copying fidelity cannot be fundamental
> > to identity,
> "Cannot" is a very strong word.
Yes but no stronger than accuracy demands.
> "Very unlikely" is more apporpriate.
Show me how it could possibly be untrue.
John K Clark
-- John K Clark email@example.com -- http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 24 2013 - 04:01:19 MDT