Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?
From: Robin Lee Powell (rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org)
Date: Tue Dec 01 2009 - 13:15:23 MST
- Next message: Bradley Thomas: "RE: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Previous message: John K Clark: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- In reply to: John K Clark: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Next in thread: Bradley Thomas: "RE: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Reply: Bradley Thomas: "RE: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:07:24PM -0800, John K Clark wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 "Robin Lee Powell"
> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> said:
>
> > How many computer science Ph.D.s would I have to get to say, in
> > writing, that that's utter nonsense for you to thoroughly
> > re-evaluate your position?
>
> 42
Since that's the Guide number, I have to ask if you're being
flippant before I put in that kind of work.
-Robin
--
They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons."
And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something
other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
- Next message: Bradley Thomas: "RE: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Previous message: John K Clark: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- In reply to: John K Clark: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Next in thread: Bradley Thomas: "RE: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Reply: Bradley Thomas: "RE: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:05 MDT