Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?
From: Mu In Taiwan (mu.in.taiwan@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Dec 01 2009 - 12:01:07 MST
- Next message: Mu In Taiwan: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Previous message: Robin Lee Powell: "[sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- In reply to: Robin Lee Powell: "[sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Next in thread: Mu In Taiwan: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Reply: Mu In Taiwan: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
> "How many computer science Ph.D.s would I have to get to say, in
> writing, that that's utter nonsense for you to thoroughly
> re-evaluate your position?"
I believe the question you are trying to ask is an age-old question in
philosophy;
"How many angels would it take to balance a pinhead?"
(With apologies to JC on this occasion)
- Next message: Mu In Taiwan: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Previous message: Robin Lee Powell: "[sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- In reply to: Robin Lee Powell: "[sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Next in thread: Mu In Taiwan: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Reply: Mu In Taiwan: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:05 MDT