From: Bradley Thomas (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Oct 12 2009 - 16:59:12 MDT
Isn't any finite algorithm bound to return to the same state eventually?
Twitter @bradleymthomas, @instansa
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of John K Clark
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 1:42 PM
To: sl4 sl4
Subject: RE: [sl4] I am a Singularitian who does not believe in the
On Fri, 9 Oct "Bradley Thomas" <email@example.com> said:
> Couldn't you just append the fixed goal with [oh yeah, plus don't get
No need, if it's fixed goal it never gets bored and that's the problem. You
have 2 choices, you can have a loyal AI that's in a coma, or you can have a
singularity producing intelligence that is not a slave to you.
John K Clark
-- John K Clark firstname.lastname@example.org -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and love email again
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:04 MDT