**From:** J. Andrew Rogers (*andrew@ceruleansystems.com*)

**Date:** Sun Jun 22 2008 - 22:42:50 MDT

**Next message:**Krekoski Ross: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"**Previous message:**Peter de Blanc: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"**In reply to:**Peter de Blanc: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"**Next in thread:**Peter de Blanc: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"**Reply:**Peter de Blanc: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Jun 22, 2008, at 9:31 PM, Peter de Blanc wrote:

*> Your first sentence is true, but you're incorrect about there being
*

*> no change in complexity. The extra complexity is in the number.
*

The length of a program's output is not its complexity. And where

does this number exist?

J. Andrew Rogers

**Next message:**Krekoski Ross: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"**Previous message:**Peter de Blanc: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"**In reply to:**Peter de Blanc: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"**Next in thread:**Peter de Blanc: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"**Reply:**Peter de Blanc: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:03 MDT
*