From: Stathis Papaioannou (email@example.com)
Date: Fri May 02 2008 - 21:09:40 MDT
2008/5/3 Mikko Rauhala <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> No (super)goal is more "intelligent" than another excepting perhaps for
> self-consistency. (Similarly, for consistency's sake, subgoals may be
> "intelligent" or not in the sense of how well they further a supergoal.)
> No matter what the new information is, it should not change a sane
> agent's goal system, merely provide new means to an end.
I had always assumed this was obvious to everyone, but apparently it
isn't. A lot of intelligent people seem to think no-one else can be
intelligent without sharing their aspirations.
-- Stathis Papaioannou
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:02 MDT